lore wrote:People will assume they're missing story, not just parts of a few images.
To claim something like that, you need to own the manga both from June and in the original. I doubt you own the originals for this particular book or the other censored new release, Cafe Latte Rhapsody (?). I do, and I can say that in both cases, the censorship changed the meaning, as it's absolutely unclear that oral sex occurred between the protagonists in June / censored editions. This is particularly the case with Cafe Latte Rhapsody, where the censorship changed the whole tone of the book (June even released it under 16+ rating, which, as we both know, is typically reserved for very timid yaoi titles in case of June). You'd never guess from the June's edition that such intimacy occurred between two main characters, I certainly couldn't.
lore wrote: Pasting "uncensored" on books just makes the entire process seem...dirty? Porny? And all BL publishers in the US are trying to avoid being tarred and feathered as porn vendors - there wouldn't be as many sales if girls and women had to ask for the books from behind a counter.
How about using such words as "unedited", "unaltered" or "artwork - just like in the original", or just simply "original artwork" for the uncensored manga, and publish censored books with NO such labels? The word "censored" or "uncensored" can be easily avoided.
lore wrote: But I think if you wrote the DMP mods or contacted Akadot and asked directly if a book has been censored, you would probably get a straight answer.
I really doubt this is the case, i.e., I really doubt I'd get a straight answer ("yes, it's censored", or "it's uncensored") if I email / PM them. But I will try it next time.
So, all that said, I don't think DMP is ever going to be printing censorship reports in the books themselves because of sales issues. And that's really for the best if we want to continue receiving any English translations, censored or not. The BL market has shrunk down to two main publishers and a few even smaller presses. We don't have much choice left other than to not purchase books at all.
Are you trying to claim that those publishers who went out of business did it
just because they published uncensored books? And June is around because they censor (and keep quiet about it)? That's how your statement reads to me. We all know this is not the case.
Yes, the bottom line on June not advertising that some books are censored is that people won't understand why or how the books are censored (very little these days, just shafts and fluids, usually)
What is else there to censor in yaoi manga
but "shafts and fluids"? Faces? Or legs and arms? Of course, censorship of explicit yaoi scenes by definition involves removing "shafts". It is
not "very little" to many buyers. If I were interested in manga without "shafts", I'd be buying non-yaoi or shounen-ai titles. Moreover, publishing hardcore uncensored yaoi (Finder, Maiden Rose) under the same imprint as censored and "shaft"-less titles can be very confusing and misleading to a buyer. I'd prefer to deal with two separate imprints, and adjust my expectations (and make purchasing decisions) accordingly.